HOW DIFFERENT TEAM DOWNSIZING APPROACHES INFLUENCE TEAM-LEVEL ADAPTATION AND PERFORMANCE.
This study examined the relative effectiveness of three structural approaches to reducing team size. Seventy-one five-person teams engaged in a simulated interactive task in which the approach to downsizing was manipulated. Results suggest that the structural approaches to reducing team size differentially impact team performance, and this relationship is mediated by how and to what degree teams adapt their task-related behaviors. Moreover, results from this study emphasize the importance of team composition in cases of team downsizing. Specifically, emotional stability and extraversion can help mitigate the negative effects associated with reducing team size.
DeRue, D. Scott1 dsderue@umich.edu?Hollenbeck, John R.2 jrh@msu.edu?Johnson, Michael D.3 mdj3@u.washington.edu?Ilgen, Daniel R.4 ilgen@msu.edu?Jundt, Dustin K.5 jundtdus@msu.edu
[1]Associate Professor of Management and Organizations at the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan;[2]Eli Broad Professor of Management at the Eli Broad Graduate School of Business Administration at Michigan State University;[3]Assistant Professor of Management and Organization at the University of Washington Business School;[4]John A. Hannah Distinguished Professor of Industrial-Organizational Psychology and Management at Michigan State University;[5]Doctoral Candidate in Industrial-Organizational Psychology at Michigan State University
